November 12, 2025

Futureality

Future Depends on What You Do

Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries

Earth system justice needed to identify and live within Earth system boundaries
  • Piketty, T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century (The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, 2014).

  • Ribot, J. Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 667–705 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rockström, J. et al. Identifying a safe and just corridor for people and the planet. Earths Future 9, e2020EF001866 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mehrabi, Z., Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. The challenge of feeding the world while conserving half the planet. Nat. Sustain. 1, 409–412 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heinz, S., Otto, I. M., Tan, R., Jin, Y. & Glebe, T. W. Cooperation enhances adaptation to environmental uncertainty: evidence from irrigation behavioral experiments in South China. Water 14, 1098 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sultana, F. Critical climate justice. Geogr. J. 188, 118–124 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Dirth, E., Biermann, F. & Kalfagianni, A. What do researchers mean when talking about justice? An empirical review of justice narratives in global change research. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100042 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Klinsky, S. et al. Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Glob. Environ. Change 44, 170–173 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grasso, M. & Tàbara, J. D. Towards a moral compass to guide sustainability transformations in a high-end climate change world. Sustainability 11, 2971 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kotzé, L. A global environmental constitution for the Anthropocene? Transnatl. Environ. Law 8, 11–33 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kothari, S. & Parajuli, P. in Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict (ed. Sachs, W.) Ch. 16 (Zed Books, 1993).

  • Whyte, K. Too late for indigenous climate justice: ecological and relational tipping points. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e603 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okereke, C. Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-operation (Routledge, 2007).

  • Gupta, J. & Lebel, L. Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals. Int. Environ. Agreem. 20, 393–410 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Biermann, F. & Kalfagianni, A. Planetary justice: a research framework. Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100049 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bullard, R. D. Solid waste sites and the black Houston community. Sociol. Inq. 53, 273–288 (1983).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Rehner, R. Energy justice: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 174–182 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hartwig, L. D., Jackson, S., Markham, F. & Osborne, N. Water colonialism and Indigenous water justice in south-eastern Australia. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 38, 30–63 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L., Del Bene, D. & Scheidel, A. Is there a global environmental justice movement? J. Peasant Stud. 43, 731–755 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Climate Change Litigation Databases (Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, 2022).

  • Schlosberg, D. & Collins, L. B. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Clim. Change 5, 359–374 (2014).

  • Taylor, P. Respect for Nature (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986).

  • Ogar, E., Pecl, G. & Mustonen, T. Science must embrace traditional and indigenous knowledge to solve our biodiversity crisis. One Earth 3, 162–165 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Leach, M. et al. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Glob. Sustain. 1, E13 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pascual, U. et al. Governing for transformative change across the biodiversity–climate–society nexus. BioScience 72, 684–704 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Making Peace With Nature: A Scientific Blueprint to Tackle the Climate, Biodiversity and Pollution Emergencies (UNEP, 2021).

  • Raworth, K. A doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. Lancet Planet. Health 1, e48–e49 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rammelt, C. F. et al. Impacts of meeting minimum access on critical earth systems amidst the Great Inequality. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00995-5 (2022).

  • IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (ed. Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

  • Martin, A. et al. Justice and conservation: the need to incorporate recognition. Biol. Conserv. 197, 254–261 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruano-Chamorro, C., Gurney, G. G. & Cinner, J. E. Advancing procedural justice in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 15.3, e12861 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fricker, M. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

  • Newell, P., Srivastava, S., Naess, L. O., Torres Contreras, G. A. & Price, R. Toward transformative climate justice: an emerging research agenda. WIREs Clim. Change 12.6, e733 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Klinsky, S. An initial scoping of transitional justice for global climate governance. Clim. Policy 18, 752–765 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bosch, H. J. & Gupta, J. Water property rights in investor-state contracts on extractive activities, affects water governance: an empirical assessment of 80 contracts in Africa and Asia. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 31, 295–316 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lamont, J. (ed.) Distributive justice (Routledge, 2017).

  • Fuchs, D. A. et al. Consumption Corridors: Living a Good Life Within Sustainable Limits (Routledge, 2021).

  • Peel, J. & Osofsky, H. M. A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnatl. Environ. Law 7, 37–67 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hickel, J., O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L. & Zoomkawala, H. National responsibility for ecological breakdown: a fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970–2017. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e342–e349 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marion Suiseeya, K. R., Elhard, D. K. & Paul, C. J. Toward a relational approach in global climate governance: exploring the role of trust. WIREs Clim. Change 12.4, e712 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Caney, S. Human rights, climate change, and discounting. Environ. Politics 17, 536–555 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Whyte, K. Settler colonialism, ecology, and environmental injustice. Environ. Soc. 9, 125–144 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Okereke, C. Global environmental sustainability: intragenerational equity and conceptions of justice in multilateral environmental regimes. Geoforum 37, 725–738 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ciplet, D. & Roberts, J. T. Splintering South: ecologically unequal exchange theory in a fragmented global climate. J. World Syst. Res. 23, 372–398 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brock, G. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2021).

  • Bell, D. in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (ed. Zalta, E. N.) (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford Univ., 2020).

  • Khelifa, R. & Mahdjoub, H. An intersectionality lens is needed to establish a global view of equity, diversity and inclusion. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1049–1054 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Malin, S. A. & Ryder, S. S. Developing deeply intersectional environmental justice scholarship. Environ. Sociol. 4, 1–7 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tremmel, J. C. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice (Routledge, 2009).

  • Otto, I. M. et al. Human agency in the Anthropocene. Ecol. Econ. 167, 106463 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Winter, C. J. Does time colonise intergenerational environmental justice theory? Environ. Politics 29, 278–296 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Eckersley, R. The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty (MIT Press, 2004).

  • Srinivasan, K. & Kasturirangan, R. Political ecology, development, and human exceptionalism. Geoforum 75, 125–128 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Singer, P. in Animal Rights (ed. Garner, R.) 7–18 (Palgrave Macmillan, 1973).

  • Pellow, D. N. What is Critical Environmental Justice? (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).

  • Nussbaum, M. C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Belknap Press, 2006).

  • Hickey, C. & Robeyns, I. Planetary justice: what can we learn from ethics and political philosophy? Earth Syst. Gov. 6, 100045 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Celermajer, D. et al. Justice through a multispecies lens. Contemp. Polit. Theory 19, 475–512 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tschakert, P. More-than-human solidarity and multispecies justice in the climate crisis. Environ. Polit. 31, 277–296 (2022).

  • Knauß, S. Conceptualizing human stewardship in the Anthropocene: the rights of nature in Ecuador, New Zealand and India. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 31, 703–722 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kramarz, T. Extractive industry disasters and community responses: a typology of vulnerable subjects. Environ. Polit. 31, 89–109 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Byskov, M. F. & Hyams, K. Epistemic injustice in climate adaptation. Ethical Theory Moral Pract. 25, 613–634 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Santos, B. D. S. Another knowledge is possible: beyond northern epistemologies (Verso Books, 2008).

  • Weiss, E. B. Climate change, intergenerational equity, and international law. Vt. J. Environ. Law 9, 615–627 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rio Declaration on Environment and Development A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I) (UNCED, 1992).

  • Holland, B. Procedural justice in local climate adaptation: political capabilities and transformational change. Environ. Polit. 26, 391–412 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gupta, J., Gupta, A. & Vegelin, C. Equity, justice and the SDGs: lessons learnt from two decades of INEA scholarship. Int. Environ. Agreem. 22, 393–409 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Siurua, H. Nature above people: Rolston and “Fortress” conservation in the South. Ethics Environ. 11, 71–96 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Humphries, P. et al. Riverscape recruitment: a conceptual synthesis of drivers of fish recruitment in rivers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 77, 213–225 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • O’Mara, K. et al. Connectivity of fish communities in a tropical floodplain river system and predicted impacts of potential new dams. Sci. Total Environ. 788, 147785 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • UNEP. Technical Summary – Global Environment Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  • McIntyre, O. The current state of development of the no significant harm principle: how far have we come? Int. Environ. Agreem. 20, 601–618 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Robeyns, I. What, if anything, is wrong with extreme wealth?. J. Hum. Dev. Capabil. 20, 251–266 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sovacool, B. K. et al. Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science 367, 30–33 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar